Obvious Things About a Moon Scam


Spread the love

Obvious things about the "moon scam" http://newsland.com/ "style =" width: 300px; ">
                        
                    

					
                    

                    
                        

<p>One proof is enough to dispel doubts about a man’s flight to the moon.</p>
<p>Saturn V flew.</p>
<p>If in front of tens of thousands of eyewitnesses who gathered on the launch day on Cape Canaveral, a 2,300-ton carrier could ascend into the sky, then all disputes about flags, irregular dust and fake photographs no longer matter. The energy capabilities of launch vehicles and booster blocks (thrust, specific impulse) are the defining moment in interplanetary flights. And if they were able to overcome the most difficult test, the remaining stages of the path could no longer cause problems. In technical terms, docking, flying and landing on the lunar surface is easier than creating a Saturn V super rocket.
 </p>
<p><img src="http://astrologie-horoscope.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/6905011-4740430.jpg"></p>
</p>
<p>Tourists on the Canaveral metro station, on the launch day of Apollo 11</p>
<p></p>
<p>Each of the five engines of the first stage of Saturn burned two tons of liquid oxygen and a thousand liters of kerosene per second. The gas generator developed power, like a turbine of an atomic icebreaker. In just two minutes, the thousand-ton structure accelerated to a hypersonic speed of 10 thousand km / h and reached a height of 68 kilometers.</p>
<p>If modern “whistleblowers” ​​could feel the trembling of the earth and witness this fire storm personally, they would be embarrassed to publish their “whistleblowers”.</p>
<p>“Saturn V” undoubtedly flew. Thousands of witnesses witnessed his start thirteen times in a row. And on the other side of the Earth, the course of the lunar mission was closely watched by powerful Soviet telescopes. The military and scientists could not be mistaken, seeing how the 47-ton ship entered the flight path to the moon …</p>
<p>In the end, who else but “Saturn V” could withdraw the Skylab orbital station (77 tons, 1973) ??</p>
<p>There is another reinforced concrete argument, the authenticity of which cannot be questioned. The lunar program was seriously worked in the Soviet Union. Which means only one thing – domestic experts did not consider landing on the moon as a technically insoluble task. Within the framework of the Soviet lunar program, a full range of technical equipment was created: the super-heavy N-1 carrier rocket, the LOC lunar orbital ship, the LK descent module and the Krechet lunar spacesuit.</p>
<p>All this has been repeatedly tested and participated in space missions!</p>
<p>Instead of reading the fascinating books of Yu. Mukhin, it is better to find detailed information about the secret victories of the Soviet Cosmos.</p>
<p>“Cosmos-379”, “Cosmos-398” and “Cosmos-434”. Three consecutive successful flights of the lunar lunar module LK (in an unmanned version) with a cycle of maneuvers in low Earth orbit.</p>
<p>“Cosmos-146”, “Cosmos-154”, as well as a series of 12 launches under the “Probe” program. All this is a test of the Soyuz 7K-L1 spacecraft, designed for a manned flyby of the Moon (without landing). Structurally, it was the Soyuz spacecraft without a household compartment, instead of which the D-1 upper stage was docked. Also, the lunar “Soyuz” was distinguished by the presence of a long-range space communications system and enhanced thermal protection. It was considered by the Soviet leadership as a relatively simple and cheap ersatz project for inflicting another defeat on America in the Space Race.</p>
<p></p>
<p>Ships “Probe-5, 6, 7, 8” flawlessly completed the program of overflight of the Moon. It was Zond-5 that became the first spacecraft to fly around the Moon with living organisms on board with their subsequent successful return to Earth (hello to all fans of tales about terrible radiation belts, as if they were killing everything alive).</p>
<p>As for a number of failures, the state commission came to the conclusion that if the “Probe” was in a manned version, its crew could very likely correct the mistakes of the automation that was still imperfect at that time.</p>
<p>These problems arose only with the most complex component of the system – the super-heavy launch vehicle N-1. But even in this case, one cannot doubt the reality of its existence. As for the first unsuccessful launches of the N-1, it really did not have time to “finish” it. Could, but did not have time.</p>
<p>And after that, various “flies” come, and talk about filming in the pavilions of Hollywood. A disgrace.</p>
<p>As for the direct landing of the Americans on the moon:</p>
<p>The fact of the existence and flights of the superheavy Saturn V LV is beyond doubt.</p>
<p>The next component of the lunar expedition is the heavy manned spacecraft Apollo. The fact of the existence of this spacecraft could be confirmed by the Soviet cosmonauts A. Leonov and V. Kubasov, participants in an experimental flight under the Soyuz-Apollon international program (docking of two spacecraft in orbit, July 15, 1975).
 </p>
<p><img src="http://astrologie-horoscope.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/6905011-4740431.jpg"></p>
<p>The volume of the command compartment is 6 cubic meters. meters.<br />
Estimated autonomy – 14 days (with the duration of lunar missions from 8 to 12 days).<br />
The fuel supply in the tanks of the service compartment is 7 tons.<br />
The oxidizer reserve is over 11 tons.<br />
The total mass of the spacecraft (without the lunar module) is 30 tons.</p>
<p>Life support systems are normal. The total stock of toliv is 18.4 tons (excluding 120 kg of nitrogen tetroxide for orientation system engines). The large and heavy Apollo had all the technical capabilities to carry out a lunar expedition (naturally, because it was created for this).</p>
<p>Landing on the moon. For some reason, this given is most questioned among the whistleblowers of the “lunar scam”. The Americans built a rocket, but could not land the module, because … Because all this is incredibly difficult from the point of view of the average man.</p>
<p>But how great is the complexity of such maneuvers for those who seriously tackled the problem? The answer can give aircraft with vertical take-off and landing.</p>
<p>March 24, 1966 is considered the birthday of Russian VTOL aircraft. On this day, three years before the Americans landed on the moon, the Soviet Yak-36 performed a vertical take-off and landing.</p>
<p>What was the difference between the vertical landing of the “Yak” and the landing of the lunar “Eagle”?</p>
<p>In both cases, the fuel supply is limited. The view from the cab leaves much to be desired. “Yaku” is even more difficult – unlike Armstrong and Aldrin, its pilot has to deal with the negative influence of the earth’s atmosphere, including dangerous gusts of crosswind. At the same time, controlling two lift-marching engines + a jet rudder system in the front and rear of the fuselage.</p>
<p>Moreover, the thrust of the Orla engine was two times less than the total thrust of the Yak-36 engines !!! Under conditions of six times less gravity, the lunar module was content with a thrust of only 4.5 tons (against 10 tons at the “Yak”). Taking into account the fact that at the time of landing he worked at the minimum mode, this explains the absence of any “terrible craters formed from the jet stream” at the place of the Eagle’s landing.</p>
<p>And after all we landed! With appropriate training, this trick became commonplace.</p>
<p>In 1972, the first Yak-38 made a vertical landing on the swinging deck of a moving ship. The total flying time during operation of these machines was 30,000 hours !!</p>
<p>During the events of the Falkland War, the British managed to land their “Harriers” on the decks of aircraft carriers in continuous fog, when the amplitude of the vertical movements of the deck reached several meters. And this was done by ordinary combat pilots. Without the help of modern computers. Exclusively on the basis of their flying skills and intuition.</p>
<p>But Armstrohn and Aldrin’s hands, apparently, grew out of the wrong place. They could not land the “Eagle” on a static surface, even when they were together, with information support and advice from the flight control center.</p>
<p>As for the space velocities of the Eagle, the descent from orbit and approaching the surface of the Moon represented a set of algorithms for turning on the brake engine, compiled on Earth. Up to a second. As with the usual return of astronauts to Earth.</p>
<p>What is so special about this?</p>
<p>Finally, if everything was so bad, how SIX soft landings of the Surveyor automatic stations were accomplished (1966-68, the mission's goal is to check the density of the soil, collect information about the terrain and features of the areas selected for the subsequent manned missions).</p>
<p>Further more. The landing of Soviet stations:</p>
<p>“Luna-9” – 1966, the first soft landing on the surface. Which was followed by “Moon-12, 16, 17, 20, 21 and 24”. Seven domestic vehicles successfully reached the moon, moreover, given the level of technology development in the 1960s, they did it almost blindly!</p>
<p>“Luna-16” not only landed, but also took off, delivering samples of lunar soil to Earth in September 1970. Luna-24 did the same.</p>
<p>Luna-17 and Luna-21 successfully delivered 800 kg lunar rovers to the satellite surface.</p>
<p>And then charlatans come and say: “Why is the flag waving at the Americans? The technique of that time did not allow flying to the moon. ”</p>
<p>Moreover, the Soviet and American space programs have always been on the same level. And if we could – why couldn't they?</p>
<p>Why stopped flying to the moon?</p>
<p>A manned flight to the moon is of no practical value even in the perspective of the coming decades (neither industrially, nor economically, nor even militarily). What can we say about the 70s. last century!</p>
<p>For a similar reason, the Yankees froze manned flights to the ISS for a decade – from 2011 to the beginning of 2020s. (renewal, plan). But is this not a reason to doubt the existence of the Shuttles?</p>
<p>“Mukhin and Co.” can consider themselves smarter than everyone, cleverly “calculating” fakes and traces of retouching on photographs of American expeditions. ABOUT! – here is the second light source. And this is a narrowing shadow. There is not that stone. And it all just looks ridiculous. It is logical to assume that if the people who built the 2300-ton Saturn really decided to deceive everyone, then you would not have guessed about the fake soon.</p>
<p>Although why do we need fakes – is there a ready-made LV of the required power, a ready-made ship and a landing module? Everything is ready for the expedition, but decided to shoot in Hollywood. So that later the whistleblowers could earn millions from their "whistleblowers."</p>
<p>Forty years have passed, haven’t there even appeared a single apparatus capable of taking photographs of the Apollo landing sites in order to dispel doubts once and for all?</p>
<p>Launched in 2009, the Lunar Orbital Reconnaissance (LRO) helped draw up a detailed 3D map of the lunar surface with a resolution of up to 0.5 m. All Apollo and Soviet automatic stations landing sites were shot.
 </p>
<p><img src="http://astrologie-horoscope.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/6905011-4740432.jpg"></p>
</p>
<p>Place of landing "Apollo 12"</p>
<p></p>
<p><img src="http://astrologie-horoscope.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/6905011-4740433.jpg"></p>
</p>
<p>Landing step of the Soviet AMS "Luna-24"</p>
<p>Of course, this argument is not worth a penny in disputes with supporters of the "moon conspiracy." All traces of a person’s stay on the moon were undoubtedly painted in Photoshop.</p>
<p>But the main arguments remain unshakable.</p>
<p>Thirteen successful launches of the super heavy LV Saturn V</p>
<p>A fully prepared Soviet lunar program, not implemented only because of the willful decision of the country's top leadership. More precisely, the loss of the need to continue the "moon race."</p>
<p>If the Yankees built a rocket engine with a thrust of 700 tons half a century ago (the thrust of one F-1 exceeded the thrust of all 32 rocket engines in both stages of the Soyuz rocket), why do these “geniuses” now fly on Russian engines?</p>
<p>The production technology of Saturn is irretrievably lost, as is the technology for manufacturing damask steel. And this is never a joke. Six million parts are the most complex of systems ever created by man. Despite the surviving drawings and even engine samples, now no one will remember in what order all this was assembled and what materials were used in the manufacture of individual elements. But the main thing is that even having spent billions on the analysis of surviving LV design samples and completely restored the technology, it is completely unclear who will undertake the production of Saturn now.</p>
<p>Hundreds of contracting firms took part in the Saturn-Apollon program, many of which over the past 40 years have changed their occupation, were overbought, merged with one another, or went bankrupt, dissolving in time.</p>
<p>Currently, a galaxy of 16 rocket engines and booster blocks (Rocketdain-68, the RL-10 family, “Centaurus”, “Falcans” Ilona Mask, the SRB solid-fuel accelerator is the most powerful rocket engine ever created, with twice as many more thrust than the Saturn rocket engine, etc.).</p>
<p>Among them – only two engines of Russian origin. These are the RD-180 (the first stage of the Atlas-III / V launch vehicle) and the upgraded NK-33 (the first stage of the Antares launch vehicle). This is not an argument in favor of NASA's technological impotence. This is a business.</p>
<p>Photo Gallery:
 </p>
<p><img src="http://astrologie-horoscope.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/6905011-4740434.jpg"></p>
</p>
<p>Launch of the 130-meter Saturn V launch vehicle</p>
<p></p>
<p><img src="http://astrologie-horoscope.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/6905011-4740435.jpg"></p>
</p>
<p>Soviet lunar spacesuit "Gyrfalcon"</p>
<p></p>
<p><img src="https://newsland.com/static/u/content_image_from_text/17102019/6905011-4740436.jpg"></p>
<p></p>
<p><img src="http://newsland.com/"></p>
</p>
<p>Boarding module cab</p>
<p></p>
<p><img src="http://newsland.com/"></p>
</p>
<p>Samples of lunar soil delivered by the Apollon-11 expedition, Moscow, VDNKh exhibition</p>
<p></p>
<p><img src="http://newsland.com/"></p>
</p>
<p>Moonstone Vault</p>
<p></p>
<p><img src="http://newsland.com/"></p>
</p>
<p>Camera of the automatic station "Surveyor-3", delivered to Earth by the expedition "Apollon-12" (the module lunched 400 meters from the landing site of "Surveyor")</p>
<p>                        @import 'https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Exo+2-00-0000,500,700&subset=cyrillic';<br />
                        .rio2016-card {<br />
                            background-color: rgba (250, 250, 250, 1);<br />
                            border: 1px solid #ccc;</p>
<p>                            width: 660px;<br />
                            margin: auto;<br />
                            padding: 20px;<br />
                            padding-top: 10px;<br />
                            padding-bottom: 10px;<br />
                            margin-top: 30px;<br />
                            margin-bottom: 0px;<br />
                            font-family: 'Exo 2', sans-serif;<br />
                        }<br />
                        .rio2016-card: last-child {<br />
                            margin-bottom: 30px;<br />
                        }<br />
                        .rio2016-card * {<br />
                            font-family: 'Exo 2', sans-serif;<br />
                        }<br />
                        .rio2016-card h2 {<br />
                            text-align: center;<br />
                        }<br />
                        .rio2016-card p {<br />
                            font-size: 18px;<br />
                        }<br />
                        .rio2016-card-position {<br />
                            display: block;<br />
                            font-size: 30px;<br />
                            text-align: center;<br />
                            color: # da0202;<br />
                            font-family: 'Exo 2', sans-serif;<br />
                            margin-bottom: 10px;<br />
                        }<br />
                        .rio2016-card-image {<br />
                            margin-top: 0px;<br />
                            border: 1px solid #ccc;<br />
                            width: 660px! important;<br />
                        }<br />
                        .rio2016-cards iframe {<br />
                            margin: auto;<br />
                            margin-top: 0px;<br />
                            border: 1px solid #ccc;<br />
                        }</p>
<p>                    <br />
  . (tagsToTranslate) Newsland (t) news (t) latest news (t) Obvious things about the “moon scam”</pre>
<p></p>
<div class=